Maslow, McGregor, and Moneyball
Moneyball has a wide variety of
themes, but one of the most important is the message the film sends about
teamwork and effective leadership within a group with low morale. Billy Beane,
played by Brad Pitt, portrays the development of a man from an angry, disheartened
manager to a trustworthy and caring leader.
About an hour and twenty-two
minutes into the film, there is a transformative moment, one where we see Brad
Pitt’s character (Billy Beane) dish out some advice to a seasoned player, new
to the team (David Justice). Justice seems slightly irritated by Billy’s
disposition regarding the team. Billy is a bit blunt with him here, saying that
he is not the player he used to be, and instead of trying to be what he once
was he needs to be a role model for the younger members of the team. David
seems satisfied with this advice, and the scene cuts to one of Justice and
Hatteberg interacting in the break room, where David makes a point to encourage
the new player. This moment is important as it displays a shift in Billy’s
attitude and management style in regards to the team and the statistical theory
that he is trying to prove. This demonstrates the power a good leader has over
his team, based on the attitude and confidence of the leader himself.
There were moments of shocking splendor, hearing Hatteberg’s bat strike the ball as he hit a home run sent chills up my spine. There were moments that I felt awkward, like when Peter had to tell Pena that he had been traded to the Tigers. There were a lot of emotions to be had, and that is part of what the film did wonderfully, keeping the watcher interested by taking them on an emotional rollercoaster where they are tearing up one minute and laughing the next.
My reaction to the film’s ending
however was one of confusion and melancholy. Billy Beane is seen driving, and
he slips in a CD, which we can see was made for him by his daughter. The song
starts off normal, but as the frame fades, and text appears telling us that
Beane turned down the 12.5-million-dollar job in Boston and that he still has
not won a world series to this day, the track contorts into his daughter
singing “you’re a loser, dad” (Moneyball, 2:06:54) over and over on a loop. To me this addition was slightly
disturbing and off-base with the tone of every other scene. Maybe it was just
that I did not find it humorous, but either way it left me with a sense of
dismay and awkwardness. It was probably the single part of the film I did not
enjoy.
Other
than providing the viewer with a unique and confounding emotional experience,
there is a profound message about the way a team of people should be managed
and treated by their leader. In the article The Human Side of Enterprise
by Douglas McGregor, two theories of management leadership are evaluated,
Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X states that “The average man is by nature
indolent” and “is inherently self-centered, indifferent to organizational needs”
(McGregor 2). Towards the beginning of the film, Billy states that he does not interact
with the players, because then it is easier for him to treat them without
empathy. He assumes that the team are not working hard enough to win, and
reprimands Jeremy Giambi harshly due to this assumption. He may have been
trying to make light of a loss, but Billy assumes he is having fun because he
is indolent, showing Theory X being applied in his management style. He is like
this towards his scouts and analytic staff as well, causing one of them to get
violent with him, and the others have distaste for him.
Billy
starts to apply Theory Y around an hour twenty into the film. Theory Y states
that “the motivation, the potential for development, the capacity for assuming responsibility,
the readiness to direct behavior toward organizational goals are all present in
people. Management does not put them there. It is a responsibility of
management to make it possible for people to recognize and develop these human
characteristics for themselves” (McGregor 6-7). Billy realizes that to make his
team the best it can be, he needs to instill confidence and community into the
group. He starts this by giving a motivational speech to his team, who have
likely never seen him except in passing before. Promptly after this, he gives his
spiel on leadership to David Justice, who takes it to heart and uses that
newfound responsibility to try and encourage Hatteberg. The style of Theory Y
management causes a trickle-down effect in the team and gives both the leader
and group members a feeling of safety and fulfillment in each other.
So how
did Billy enact this change? The actions taken by Billy can be boiled down to a
hierarchy of needs, detailed by Abraham Maslow in 1943. Maslow organized
certain needs, that when fulfilled, leads to the most satisfied worker in a
management setting. These needs need to be met, in this order; Physiological
needs, Safety needs, love needs, esteem needs, and self-actualization needs
(Maslow). Billy corrects each of these needs as he reforms the team through
better management.
For the safety tier, Billy cuts
certain players to have a structure where every player has a specific purpose.
This secures their job safety and allows them to focus on their performance
instead of the anxiety of being traded themselves.
For the love tier, Billy starts to
interact with his players on a personal level. He talks to them privately and
shows his support through motivational language and affection, like pats on the
back. Man is a social animal that craves relationships, and by allowing his
players to foster a relationship with him, they feel valued by him and the rest
of their team.
The esteem tier was represented the
most throughout the film, especially in the plot revolving around Hatteberg.
Billy asks David Justice to be a leader, and then he decides to encourage
Hatteberg in the break room. Hatteberg also gets encouragement from a private
conversation with Billy as well. These elements are what helps build up
Hatteberg into being able to hit the home run later in the film. This is his
moment of self-actualization, the last tier in the hierarchy and a marker
showing Hatteberg’s development as a character.
McGregor’s theories and Maslow’s
hierarchy allows for a dissection of Billy’s development throughout the film,
showing a transformation from mediocrity to impressive leadership of the
Oakland A’s.
References:
Maslow, A. H. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review, vol. 50, no. 4, 1943, pp. 370–396., doi:10.1037/h0054346. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
McGregor, Douglas M. “The Human Side of Enterprise.” Readings and Exercises in Organizational Behavior, 1985, pp. 28–35., doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-054752-4.50008-7.
Miller, Bennett. Moneyball. Columbia Pictures, 2011.


Good essay! One thing that I noticed that I liked was the discussion regarding the part in the movie when Beane starting to trade players. I felt awkward as well, mainly because he traded everyone away that the coach liked. The players that were traded were being played over the guys Beane wanted to have playing, so it seemed selfish and it was. It was selfish, but he knew that was the only way to get the lineup the way he wanted. Obviously Beane was successful and it was a good thing because he trusted his gutsy ideas.
ReplyDeleteYour analysis of this film is very well written. I had a lot of the same feelings you did during those scenes, but my reaction to the ending was much different than yours. While Billy is driving and listening to his daughter singing, the way I interpreted his reaction was that he was realizing what was the most important thing to him, and that thing was not money, or even winning. His daughter calling him a loser is a lighthearted way of saying that he is misguided, and at heart he really doesn't need to win to be fulfilled. Him hearing this helped him come to the realization that he was happy as the GM for the Oakland A's. His pursuit for a higher paying position on a winning team would leave him feeling empty and dissatisfied in the end. At least that is how I interpreted it, let me know what you think!
ReplyDelete